Thursday, July 12, 2012

Browns stay aggressive and take WR Josh Gordon

The NFL supplemental draft just happened for 2012. In short, here's what that means.
  • Players who have had a change in circumstances between the Deadline to declare for the April NFL draft and the deadline for a possible supplemental draft (usually in July) may be subject for an additional draft by the NFL teams.
  • This doesn't happen often and usually just includes one player. (I don't know exactly why Josh Gordon was eligible other than he sat out last year and changed his mind about the NFL because his family needs money)
  • NFL Teams are pooled into groups based on last years standings. They are then given weights and entered into a lottery. The order is picked by weighted percentage and by which pool they are in.
  • The more important part of that is that the Teams indicated (confidentially) which 2013 draft pick they would give up to take X player.
  • The Team willing to give up the highest pick based on the order of the supplemental draft gets the player and loses the future draft pick.
So in the 2012 NFL Supplemental Draft, the Browns were awarded Josh Gordon, WR Baylor/Utah in the 2nd round.  This is because nobody gave up a first round pick, and the Browns were the first team (based on the order) to give up a 2nd round pick.

This really stays consistant with the new Aggressive attitude the Browns Front Office have demonstrated in the draft.  First they aggressively trade up to make sure they get Trent Richardson, then they take Weeden ahead of most thought they would, and now they give up a 2nd round pick in 2013 on a guy who didn't play NCAA football last year.

They basically got another Greg Little, however, Gordon was projected to be a Top 10 pick overall next year if he plays out the year in Utah and maintains a reasonable level of performance.  So he's got some growing to do..but if Little progresses as expected and Gordon has the same kind of year Little had last year...the Browns will finally be 'Okay' at WR.  And then in 2013 that tandom could be something special.

There is some optimism here.  (there are also many questions...but for now at least there is some hope)

 

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Mike's Long Awaited Return

I apologize for the delay to all of our faithful readers (I'm not sure why I pluralized the word readers...but wishful thinking I suppose).  Here a just a bunch of thoughts without any rhyme or reason from all the news I didn't comment on during my absense.

LeBron wins a ring. ::sigh::  Luckily the sun came up, and he's still a self-centered jerk.  Life goes on.

The Browns had a good draft.  I am getting more and more excited about Weeden and Richardson as the season draws near.

I don't buy in to all the complaints about the Browns WR core.  They aren't great, but I don't agree that it was a priority to waste a lot of money or high draft picks on one.

I keep coming back to many, many championship teams that win in the NFL with a great QB and average WRs.  I don't see teams winning with great WRs and an average QB.  Ideally you want both...I agree...but I also want a million dollars and that's not happening either.

Cavs draft was intriguing.  I feel good about it..but that could just be the media making it sound better than it is.

Indians...ugh.  So hard to get overly excited about a team of average players.  They are playing well enough to keep interest, but I'm getting more nervous as the days go on.

I do think that the front office will make a move, but will it be too little too late.  Will the team be 6 games back by the trade deadline and the other teams have hit their stride.  Luckily by then, Training Camp will open and we will have scheduled Man Day III

If the schedulers of Browns Training Camp have any kind of sense, they will schedule a practice that is open to the public after the release of The Expendibles 2 so that Man Day III can be EPIC this year.

Thank God for wi-fi access during Jury Duty!

...stay tuned...more to come as I think of it.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Annual Madden Comparison

So for a few years now after the draft ends I've compared that to my Madden Franchise to see how the digital versions of the same players turned out.  So this is five years into all of their careers:

It's the player, their position, and their rating out of a best possible 99.


Luck - QB - 99
RG3 - QB - OUT OF LEAGUE
Richardson - RB - 94
Kalil - LT - 72
Blackmon - WR - 88
Claiborne - CB - 74
Barron - SS - 95
Tannehill - QB - OUT OF LEAGUE
Kuechly - LB - 93
Gilmore - CB - 96
Poe - DT - OUT OF LEAGUE
Cox - DT - 85
Floyd - WR - 86
Brockers - DT - OUT OF LEAGUE
Irvin - DE - OUT OF LEAGUE
Couples - DE - 69
Kirkpatrick - CB - 96
Ingram - DE - 77
McCellin - DE - 85
Wright - WR - OUT OF LEAGUE
Jones - DE - OUT OF LEAGUE
Weeden - QB - 93
Reiff - LT - 92
DeCastro - LG - 85
Hightower - LB - 86
Mercilus - DE - OUT OF LEAGUE
Zeitler - RG - 71
Perry - DE - 75
Smith - FS - OUT OF LEAGUE
Jenkins - WR - OUT OF LEAGUE
Martin - RB - 69
Wilson - RB - 77

Out of League means the obvious - OR, it could mean that they were just never drafted.  I have no way of knowing.  So good job, Washington and Miami.  You drafted QBs that have a very crappy digital counterpart.

And nice job Cleveland apparently, for getting two players above 90 in the first round.

In this Madden Franchise - I have Andrew Luck as the best QB in the NFL, Cam Newton is 2nd best, and Aaron Rodgers is 3rd best.

UNDRAFTED Chris Polk is the best RB in the NFL.

AJ Green and Calvin Johnson are the two best WRs.

Here is how the rest of Cleveland's Draft Went..   Overall, except for the first two picks…absolutely horrible:


Richardson - RB - 94
Weeden - QB - 93
Schwartz - T - OUT OF LEAGUE
Hughes - DT - OUT OF LEAGUE
Benjamin - WR - OUT OF LEAGUE
Johnson - MLB - OUT OF LEAGUE
Miller - G - OUT OF LEAGUE
Acho - LB - 83
Wynn - DT - 75
Wade - CB - OUT OF LEAGUE
Smelley - TE - OUT OF LEAGUE

We'll see if Acho turns out to be a good linebacker, but based on the digi counterparts, don't look for anything special out of this one..

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Browns 2012-13 Season

Cleveland Browns 2012 Schedule and pre-draft predictions.  I know it's silly to even guess at this point, because like last year who knew that San Francisco would go 13-3 or whatever they did...

Sunday, September 9 vs. Philadelphia Eagles, 1 p.m. ET
This should be a horrible, horrible loss.  Possibly around 35-3.

Sunday, September 16 at Cincinnati Bengals, 1 p.m. ET
This could be a good game, but a loss.  24-21.

Sunday, September 23 vs. Buffalo Bills, 1 p.m. ET
This could be a win.

Thursday, September 27 at Baltimore Ravens, 8:20 p.m. ET
Loss.  100-0.

Sunday, October 7 at New York Giants, 1 p.m. ET
This I can almost guarantee will be a win.  The Giants will be overlooking the Browns, as usual; and we will shock them here.

Sunday, October 14 vs. Cincinnati Bengals, 1 p.m. ET
Loss.  Andy Dalton will be in stride with his new weapons by this point.

Sunday, October 21 at Indianapolis Colts, 1 p.m. ET
Win.  Andrew Luck will still be getting used to the NFL.

Sunday, October 28 vs. San Diego Chargers, 1 p.m. ET
Loss.

Sunday, November 4 vs. Baltimore Ravens, 1 p.m. ET
Loss.  107-0

Sunday, November 11 BYE WEEK
Loss.

Sunday, November 18 at Dallas Cowboys, 1 p.m. ET
Probably a loss, but you never know what Dallas is going to do..

Sunday, November 25 vs. Pittsburgh Steelers, 1 p.m. ET
Loss, but it will be close.  Pittsburgh lost a lot this off season.  Getting rid of Hines Ward will honestly mean that the other receivers will be better covered.

Sunday, December 2 at Oakland Raiders, 4:15 p.m. ET
Loss.  We can't ever beat Oakland.

Sunday, December 9 vs. Kansas City Chiefs, 1 p.m. ET
Loss.  Someone will throw their helmet.

Sunday, December 16 vs. Washington Redskins, 1 p.m. ET
This will probably be a win.  We'll be due at this point.

Sunday, December 23 at Denver Broncos, 4:05 p.m. ET
Loss.  Manning will be well on his way to leading Denver to the playoffs.

Sunday, December 30 at Pittsburgh Steelers, 1 p.m. ET
Loss, but it will be close again....

Pre-draft prediction: 3-13.

Monday, April 2, 2012

Wrestlemania

I'm a little torn on this show, but overall was happy with it.. First post in a while here on the blog, why not it be about Wrestlemania?

Show started with Daniel Bryan defending the World Heavyweight Title against Sheamus. I hate Sheamus. He's a worthless wrestler. He's an awful character. There's absolutely nothing good about him and I feel like he's positioned to become another Randy Orton.. (The guy who accomplished absolutely nothing other than management saying: "You're going to be our new guy.") Sheamus won the Royal Rumble and picked Bryan as his Wrestlemania opponent. I rule I've become to hate, because you shouldn't create feuds for Wrestlemania, Wrestlemania should be the culmination of a feud.... Anyways. The crowd boos Sheamus during his intro (rightfully so) and then cheers Daniel Bryan. Half the crowd is screaming "YES!" over and over (Daniel Bryan's catchphrase of sorts) and have "YES!" signs in the crowd.

Front row: 10 people, each with a sign that says "YES!". And then, the WWE decides to have Sheamus win with one kick to the head. Match was 18 seconds long. Sheamus beats Daniel Bryan to no reaction from the crowd, just a bunch of people who couldn't believe what they just saw. The WWE now looks like ASSHOLES. They've deflated the crowd. The crowd no longer gives a shit. We're 2 minutes into WRESTLEMANIA and suddenly no one gives a shit anymore and we all hate this show. Negative Five Stars.

Second Match: Randy Orton versus Kane. This match was absolutely terrible and boring as we would all expect. Then Kane, the villain, wins clean. This will naturally set up Orton v Kane, Anything Goes next month and we'll get to watch this awful match all over again. This match was 10 minutes long and the only thing I remember was an 8 minute headlock before Kane won with a chokeslam off the top rope. Zero Stars. Match was boring as hell and made me start to drink.

Third Match: Big Show challenges Cody Rhodes for the Intercontinental Title. Another stupid, pointless match. This was another feud where which happened AFTER the match was announced. Show wins the Intercontinental Title clean; I don't even remember how. Another zero star match where nothing happened.

Fourth Match: The Divas Tag. I didn't watch any of this. I did other things.

Fifth Match: Hell in a Cell, Undertaker versus HHH. This match, looking back on it, was a war. It started with Taker in control, then HHH got the upperhand, then Taker came back and won. Taker started off strong, then HHH got the advantage, leading to a similar battle like last year's match. HHH just kept hammering Taker and couldn't keep him down. Shawn was pleading with him to stop the fight, everything. Taker kept getting up. Then Taker made the comeback he never made last year. The two matches played off each other perfectly. The Hell in a Cell wasn't really a factor, but it's always a nice visual. Aside from one Superkick from Shawn (because he just wanted the match ended, for both competitors' sakes..) He was completely impartial. When Taker made the comeback he never made a year ago, it was fantastic. It was HHH absolutely being pummeled into jello. Then Taker smashed him with his own sledgehammer and tombstoned him for the win. It was a fantastic match and I'll give it Four and a half stars. Initially, I said that last year's match was better, but it wasn't. This year's was better, but only because of last year's match. Taker got his revenge and destroyed The Game.

They all walked out together and hugged, this could be an unofficial retirement match for all three involved..

Sixth Match: The 12 man tag. How can you screw up a 12 man tag? No flow, no anarchy, no anything. Match was boring as hell. Then Zack Ryder FINALLY got involved and then just lost to the Miz. Match was awful. Everyone in it was awful. Completely pointless. Zero stars.

Seventh Match: WWE Championship, CM Punk defending against Chris Jericho. Very slow start to this one, then it picked up nicely. Just a good solid match, but I felt like they could've done more. I'll give it Four Stars. CM Punk winning assures me that he's around to stay as a top guy. He's quickly getting on the WWE's imaginary ranks of Cena and Orton levels. But CM Punk actually deserves his spot. He wasn't just picked. I don't know what is next for Jericho unless they do a rematch next month. Or maybe this was it for Jericho and he's going back to his band?

Eighth Match: John Cena versus The Rock. This match was great, except for Cena's odd choice of using a bear hug multiple times. Other than that, absolutely fantastic. Energy was off the charts, Cena was boo'ed out of the building. Rock was cheered like a hero. They were in Miami, so that's no shock. Rock actually won this match. Which was insanely shocking. Had Cena won, they would've needed that Brock Lesnar run in to save things. But he didn't, Rock did. Great match, great sequences, great effort. Rock hasn't lost a step. He had that warm up match back in November, but never really needed to get going in that one. Here, he had the spotlight and didn't disappoint. Four and a half stars, easily.

So - I'm torn on this show, because the top four matches... one of them wasn't a match and the other three kicked ass. So what was really hyped delivered.. and the rest was complete garbage. But with three fantastic matches... Let's see how that stacks up against the rest of the Wrestlemania's:

1: no good matches. (0)
2: one decent tag team match. (0)
3: biggest match ever, but awful; possible best match ever.. (1)
4: no good matches, long and boring (0)
5: long and boring, one great main event (1)
6: long and boring, one great main event (1)
7: great main event; then possible best match ever.. (2)
8: two great matches...(2)
9: nothing
10: two of the best matches ever, otherwise garbage (2)
11: nothing at all, then the best celeb match ever.. (1?)
12: boring or stupid from start to finish, (yes, including the Ironman match...) (0)
13: garbage and then one of the best matches ever (1)
14: overall a fun show, but nothing spectacular... Good main event (1)
15: garbage, and a good main event (1)
16: two good undercard matches, otherwise crap.. (2 barely)
17: probably the best WWE show ever: (vince v shane in a fun match; THE TLC match you remember; HHH v Taker in an all out brawl; angle v benoit in a masterpiece; and a possible best match ever with austin v rock) (5)
18: lots of average matches and then rock v hogan (1)
19: another good show (austin v rock; booker v hhh; hardy v mysterio; angle v lesnar; jericho v shawn) (5, but less important matches)
20: around three good matches, surrounded by crap. (3)
21: crap. crap. crap. and michaels v angle in one of the best matches ever (1)
22: long and forgettable. good cena v hhh main event (1)
23: long and forgettable. I think this was the donald trump show.. good main event(1)
24: edge v taker and nothing else i remember (1)
25: lots of nothing, an awful kid rock concert, and then possibly the best match ever with shawn v taker.. (1)
26: a very well planned wrestlemania.. (edge v jericho; cena v batista; shawn v taker) and a bunch of other average matches.. nothing terrible. (3)
27: this is the worst wrestlemania of all time. the main events were edge v del rio; cena v miz; and hhh v taker. HHH v taker was great, everything else was complete garbage. iron sheik f's this show and makes it humble. (1)
28: (cena v rock; jericho v punk; hhh v taker) (3)..


So..this was actually one of the better ones. Even with the horrendous start. This actually makes (wrestling-wise) 17 the best, followed by 19, then 20, 26, and 28. Dare I say this was the fifth best Wrestlemania ever, strictly by the good match count?


I'm somewhat shocked I came to this conclusion.

Good show, WWE. But F you for the Daniel Bryan match. Two years in a row.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Kyrie Irving

Kyrie Irving just tied LeBron James' All-Time game winning shots record.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

PIPA/SOPA

The Scout Team.net does not support PIPA/SOPA.

However, since this is just a google blog, we can't figure out how to take it down for today.

The two people responsible for these two bills have no idea how the internet works, and what they have written is going to have many unintended consequences. I can only assume they're sitting back going, "No, this is fine. We don't need all that technical mumbo-jumbo in there."

Seriously, here's the most insulting piece of the SOPA bill, paraphrased: "A domestic site is a site defined as having a commonly used extension, such as .com, .net, .org, etc. And a foreign site is a site defined as not being a domestic site." Now, what's funny about this is there's one popular pirating site called thepiratebay.org. Which is an overseas, protected from the US website DEDICATED to illegally hosting media. But according to SOPA, that's a domestic site.

Huh!?

This would be like (and please believe me, this is just a stupid example) say we made it illegal for black people to say.. shop on Amazon.com. Our bill defined white people as people with light skin complexion. And Black people as "Not White People."

Therefore, an Asian person is Black. How stupid is that?? THAT is exactly how this bill is written, but in regards to websites.

And here's the goal: So that Hollywood studios can directly shut down sites like YouTube/Facebook/etc when they notice that someone has posted a funny movie clip without their permission. Or so that the music industry can have YouTube shut down if they notice someone put a Lady Gaga song in the background of their stupid birthday party video.

It's ridiculous. It's absolutely ridiculous.

The people who drafted this bill want to see an internet where you can't post comments, have forums, share videos, or input any sort of content whatsoever; because it MIGHT be copyright infringement.

With these bills, the NFL could go after Mike and I for talking about a Browns game.

Imagine if our physical world operated like the internet once this bill is in place: Say you're walking out of a movie theater and you say to your friend, "That movie really sucked." And he says, "Yeah, why on Earth did we go see the Rock'em Sock'em Robots movie??" Immediately after that a cop ran up and shot you because you just talked about the movie, and it was in a negative way.

These bills would allow a Hollywood studio to tell The Government to shut down a website because they spoke badly about an upcoming film.

Would they ever do that? I think that would be suicide to have that kind of press. Oh, but then they could just have the news sites be shut down as well, because the bill doesn't have anything in it to prevent abuse.

If you want to stop piracy, how about this novel idea: GO AFTER THE FUCKING PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING IT!!! Not the very essence of the internet!!! Put pressure on whatever country hosts the god damn piratebay to get it shut down! Keep fining the shit out of people who bring cameras into the theaters! But don't block facebook because someone put up a link to the piratebay on it!



Anyways.... OK back to sports.

If the Browns take RG3 they're stupid. That's not a knock on RG3 at all. The Browns need to stick with Colt McCoy and get him a fantastic Wide Receiver. Colt + Justin Blackmon + Cribbs is 100% better than RG3 + Cribbs + Massaquoi. End of discussion.